Standard Bank PLC v. Runge, Inc.

Filing 188

ORDER Granting 187 Motion to Amend re 181 . (A) PAH to renew or file its Supplement to its 167 Motion For Fees on or before January 10, 2012; (B) Standard and Jones Day to file their responses to PAHs 167 Motion For Fees onor before February 14, 2012; (C) PAH to file its Reply in support of its 167 Motion For Fees on or before February 28, 2012, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/20/2011.(rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-01989-RPM STANDARD BANK, PLC, Plaintiff, vs. RUNGE, INC., f/k/a RUNGE MINING, INC., and d/b/a PINCOCK, ALLEN & HOLT, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PAH’S [UNOPPOSED] MOTION TO AMEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PAH’S MOTION FOR FEES PREVIOUSLY PROPOSED BY THE PARTIES AND APPROVED BY THE COURT ______________________________________________________________________________ AND NOW this 20th day of December, 2011, the Defendant PAH’s [Unopposed] Motion To Amend The Briefing Schedule Regarding PAH’s Motion For Fees Previously Proposed By The Parties And Approved By The Court having been received by the Court, the Court having reviewed the file and being advised in the premises, it is hereby, ORDERED that the previously set briefing schedule regarding PAH’s Motion For Fees, is amended to provide as follows: (A) PAH to renew or file its Supplement to its Motion For Fees on or before January 10, 2012; (B) Standard and Jones Day to file their responses to PAH’s Motion For Fees on or before February 14, 2012; (C) PAH to file its Reply in support of its Motion For Fees on or before February 28, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ___________________________________ Hon. Richard P. Matsch United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?