Standard Bank PLC v. Runge, Inc.
Filing
188
ORDER Granting 187 Motion to Amend re 181 . (A) PAH to renew or file its Supplement to its 167 Motion For Fees on or before January 10, 2012; (B) Standard and Jones Day to file their responses to PAHs 167 Motion For Fees onor before February 14, 2012; (C) PAH to file its Reply in support of its 167 Motion For Fees on or before February 28, 2012, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 12/20/2011.(rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 07-cv-01989-RPM
STANDARD BANK, PLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
RUNGE, INC., f/k/a RUNGE MINING, INC., and
d/b/a PINCOCK, ALLEN & HOLT,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PAH’S [UNOPPOSED] MOTION TO AMEND THE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING PAH’S MOTION FOR FEES PREVIOUSLY
PROPOSED BY THE PARTIES AND APPROVED BY THE COURT
______________________________________________________________________________
AND NOW this 20th day of December, 2011, the Defendant PAH’s [Unopposed]
Motion To Amend The Briefing Schedule Regarding PAH’s Motion For Fees Previously Proposed
By The Parties And Approved By The Court having been received by the Court, the Court having
reviewed the file and being advised in the premises, it is hereby,
ORDERED that the previously set briefing schedule regarding PAH’s Motion For
Fees, is amended to provide as follows:
(A) PAH to renew or file its Supplement to its Motion For Fees on or before
January 10, 2012;
(B) Standard and Jones Day to file their responses to PAH’s Motion For Fees on
or before February 14, 2012;
(C) PAH to file its Reply in support of its Motion For Fees on or before
February 28, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
___________________________________
Hon. Richard P. Matsch
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?