Drussel Wilfley Design, LLC v. Youngwerth et al

Filing 144

ORDER. The stay of proceedings is continued at the parties' request to and including 04/29/11. On or before 04/29/11, the parties shall file a status report addressing the status of the case by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/08/11. (jjh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 07-cv-02069-WYD-BNB DRUSSEL WILFLEY DESIGN, LLC, a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. ALBERT J. YOUNGWERTH, an individual, and REKLUSE MOTOR SPORTS, INC., a Utah corporation, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This case was stayed by an order of the district judge while reexamination proceedings occurred in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Order [Doc. # 129, filed 1/30/2009], and subsequently was administratively closed. Order [Doc. # 133, filed 4/1/2009]. Following the submission of status reports, I entered an order continuing the existing stay to allow the parties to discuss their competitive issues and how to proceed on procedural issues; allow new reexamination requests to be filed with the Patent Office; and allow the parties to discuss settlement. Order [Doc. # 141, filed 1/7/2011]. The parties now request that the stay be continued. Joint Status Report [Doc. # 143, filed 3/7/2011]. IT IS ORDERED: (1) The stay of proceedings is continued at the parties' request to and including April 29, 2011; and (2) On or before April 29, 2011, the parties shall file a status report addressing the status of the case and what additional pretrial proceedings, if any, should be scheduled. Dated March 8, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?