Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. v. Actsoft, Inc. et al
Filing
369
MINUTE ORDER granting 367 Plaintiff Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to Take Preservation Deposition and Request for Expedited Ruling. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/2/12.(mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02261-PAB-MJW
ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
ACTSOFT, INC., et al.,
Defendant(s).
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc.’s Motion for
Leave to Take Preservation Deposition and Request for Expedited Ruling (docket no.
367) is GRANTED finding good cause shown and finding that Plaintiff has meet the
requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 27. The parties shall act in accordance with the Plaintiff
Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc.’s Notice of Preservation Deposition of Jeff Hawthorne
(docket no. 367-1) and take Mr. Hawthorne’s preservation deposition on Friday,
February 17, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. at the law offices of Lathrop & Gage, 950 17th Street,
Suite 2400, Denver, Colorado.
Jeffrey Hawthorne is Plaintiff AMS’ Co-Founder, Chief Technology Officer and
Inventor. Mr. Hawthorne has been diagnosed with cancer. Mr. Hawthorne is an
endorsed fact and expert witness for Plaintiff AMS. Mr. Hawthorne’s battle with cancer
has taken a turn for the worse and his testimony needs to be preserved since he may
be unavailable at future hearings before this court. Plaintiff AMS would be prejudiced if
Mr. Hawthorne’s testimony is not preserved at this time. I find no prejudice to
Defendant in taking the preservation deposition of Mr. Hawthorne. Lastly, I find that
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1 C, states, in pertinent part, [N]othing in this rule precludes a
judicial officer from ruling on a motion at any time after it is filed.
Date:
February 2, 2012
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?