Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. Dude et al

Filing 160

ORDER ON PREEMPTORY CHALLENGES. The plaintiff shall have three peremptory challenges and David Lester shall have two peremptory challenges and Dee Investments, Harold Dude and Denise Roberts shall have two peremptory challenges, making a total of seven peremptory challenges, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/13/11. (gmssl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 1:07-cv-02299-RPM STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation, Plaintiff, vs. HARALD DUDE, individually and as general partner of DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Nevada limited partnership, DENISE ROBERTS, individually and as general partner of DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Nevada limited partnership, DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, and DAVID LESTER, Defendants. _________________________________________________________ DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Nevada limited partnership, HAROLD DUDE and DENISE ROBERTS, Counterclaimant and Third party plaintiffs vs. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation; STEWART TITLE OF COLORADO, INC., a Colorado corporation; and DAVID LESTER, Counter-defendant and Third-party Defendants. ORDER ON PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES Because Weaver and Mitchell is no longer a party in this case and because the remaining defendants have antagonistic interests which warrant separate peremptory challenges for them but the plaintiff and Stewart Title of Colorado, Inc., have a common interest, it is ORDERED that the plaintiff shall have three peremptory challenges and David Lester shall have two peremptory challenges and Dee Investments, Harold Dude and Denise Roberts shall have two peremptory challenges, making a total of seven peremptory challenges. DATED: June 13th, 2011 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?