Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. Dude et al
Filing
223
ORDER granting 221 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, Without Prejudice, Stewart Title's Claims Against Denise Roberts by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/16/11.(jjh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02299-RPM
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
HARALD DUDE, individually and as general partner of DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, Nevada limited partnership,
DENISE ROBERTS, individually and as general partner of DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, Nevada limited partnership, and
DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Nevada limited partnership
Defendants,
DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Nevada limited partnership,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
STEWART TITLE OF COLORADO, INC., a Colorado corporation;
WEAVER & MITCHELL, INC., a Colorado registered trade name; and
DAVID LESTER, an individual,
Third-Party Defendants.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
STEWART TITLE’S CLAIMS AGAINST DENISE ROBERTS
____________________________________________________________________________________
Upon review of the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, Without Prejudice, Stewart Title’s Claims
Against Denise Roberts [221] filed November 14, 2011, it is
ORDERED that Stewart Title’s claims against Defendant Denise Roberts are dismissed, without
prejudice. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the dismissal of Stewart Title’s claims against Defendant Denise
Roberts does not operate as an adjudication on the merits of Stewart Title’s claims against Defendant
Denise Roberts.
DATED: November 16th, 2011
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
_________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?