Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. Dude et al

Filing 223

ORDER granting 221 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, Without Prejudice, Stewart Title's Claims Against Denise Roberts by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 11/16/11.(jjh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-02299-RPM STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation, Plaintiff, v. HARALD DUDE, individually and as general partner of DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Nevada limited partnership, DENISE ROBERTS, individually and as general partner of DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Nevada limited partnership, and DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Nevada limited partnership Defendants, DEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Nevada limited partnership, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. STEWART TITLE OF COLORADO, INC., a Colorado corporation; WEAVER & MITCHELL, INC., a Colorado registered trade name; and DAVID LESTER, an individual, Third-Party Defendants. _______________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, STEWART TITLE’S CLAIMS AGAINST DENISE ROBERTS ____________________________________________________________________________________ Upon review of the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, Without Prejudice, Stewart Title’s Claims Against Denise Roberts [221] filed November 14, 2011, it is ORDERED that Stewart Title’s claims against Defendant Denise Roberts are dismissed, without prejudice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the dismissal of Stewart Title’s claims against Defendant Denise Roberts does not operate as an adjudication on the merits of Stewart Title’s claims against Defendant Denise Roberts. DATED: November 16th, 2011 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch _________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?