Aurora, Colorado, City of v. PS Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 120

ORDER: re: Settlement Conference set for 10/29/2009 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/20/09. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 07-cv-02371-PAB-BNB CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, a municipal corporation, acting by and through its Utility Enterprise, Aurora Water, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, and GRIMM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., d/b/a Garney Construction, a Colorado corporation, Counterclaim Defendant, v. PS SYSTEMS, INC., a Colorado corporation, and RAR GROUP, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ I held a settlement conference in this matter on September 23, 2009, and progress toward settlement appeared to have been made. I ordered the parties to provide to me on or before November 20, 2009, a status report addressing their settlement efforts. I subsequently have been informed that issues have arisen concerning the parties' settlement efforts. IT IS ORDERED that a settlement/status conference is set for October 29, 2009, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel only must attend the conference in person. (Client representatives are welcome to attend, but their attendance is not required.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit confidential settlement statements to my chambers on or before October 26, 2009, addressing any developments in their settlement positions subsequent to the settlement conference on September 23, 2009. Dated October 20, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?