Rezaq v. Nalley et al

Filing 70

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part plaintiff's 68 Unopposed Motion for an Entry of an Amended Scheduling Order. Granted to amend the 63 Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 11/9/2009. Dispositive Motions due by 12/14/2009. Mo tion denied as to setting of dates for the Trial Preparation Conference or trial. Final Pretrial Conference is RESET to 2/22/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/30/09. (ecmsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-02483-LTB-KLM OMAR REZAQ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL NALLEY, RON WILEY, MICHAEL MUKASEY, and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Entry of an Amended Scheduling Order [Docket No. 68; Filed January 29, 2009] (the "Motion"). Plaintiff seeks an extension of all case deadlines and to have dates set for the Trial Preparation Conference and trial. However, the Court has no authority to set dates for a Trial Preparation Conference or trial because those events are set by the District Judge assigned to this matter [Docket No. 41]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. To the extent that the Motion seeks extensions of case deadlines, the Motion is granted. However, to the extent that the Motion seeks the setting of dates for the Trial Preparation Conference or trial, the Motion is denied. As the parties were informed by the District Judge, such dates will be set after the completion of the Final Pretrial Conference and the entering of a Final Pretrial Order [Docket No. 67]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Order entered on March 26, 2008 [Docket No. 40], and amended on December 30, 2008 [Docket No. 63], is modified to set the following deadlines: · · · · Expert Designation Deadline Rebuttal Expert Designation Deadline Discovery Cutoff Dispositive Motions Deadline August 10, 2009 September 14, 2009 November 9, 2009 December 14, 2009 No further extensions of the discovery and dispositive motions deadlines will be permitted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Final Pretrial Conference set for August 13, 2009 at 9:30 a.m. is vacated and RESET to February 22, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C-204, Second Floor, of the Byron Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado, 80294. The parties shall submit their proposed pretrial order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures no later than February 15, 2010. The proposed pretrial order to be submitted to the Magistrate Judge under the ECF Procedures must be submitted in a useable format (i.e., WordPerfect) and shall be emailed to the Magistrate Judge at Mix_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. Attorneys and/or pro se parties not participating in ECF shall submit their proposed pretrial order on paper to the Clerk's Office. However, if any party in this case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed pretrial order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures. The parties shall prepare the proposed pretrial order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded in richtext format from the forms section of the court's website at www.co.uscourts.gov. Instructions for downloading in richtext format are posted in the forms section of the website. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B. Dated: January 30, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?