Stender et al v. Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Filing
155
ORDER that the parties confer and file, on or before May 9, 2011, a Joint Status Report, apprising the Court of their efforts to jointly retain an arbitrator. If at that time the parties have not retained an arbitrator, the Court will rule on Plaintiffs Motion for Court Appointed Arbitrator. Joint Status Report due by 5/9/2011. by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/18/2011. (erv, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02503-WJM-MJW
STEVEN A. STENDER, and
INFINITY CLARK STREET OPERATING, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JAMES A. CARDWELL, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Court Appointed Arbitrator
(ECF No. 147). In their Reply in support of this motion, Plaintiffs represent to the Court
that on April 8, 2011, the parties sent joint letters to prospective arbitrators. Plaintiffs
suggest that the Court provide a 30-day window from that date for the parties to jointly
retain an arbitrator, at the end of which the parties would file a Joint Status Report
apprising the Court of their efforts. If, at that time, the parties have not retained an
arbitrator, the Court would rule on Plaintiff’s motion to appoint one. The Court is in
accord with Plaintiffs’ suggested course of action.
•
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties confer and file, on or before May
9, 2011, a Joint Status Report, apprising the Court of their efforts to jointly retain
an arbitrator. If at that time the parties have not retained an arbitrator, the Court
will rule on Plaintiff’s Motion for Court Appointed Arbitrator.
1
Dated this 18th day of April, 2011
BY THE COURT:
s/ William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?