Stender et al v. Archstone-Smith Operating Trust

Filing 155

ORDER that the parties confer and file, on or before May 9, 2011, a Joint Status Report, apprising the Court of their efforts to jointly retain an arbitrator. If at that time the parties have not retained an arbitrator, the Court will rule on Plaintiffs Motion for Court Appointed Arbitrator. Joint Status Report due by 5/9/2011. by Judge William J. Martinez on 4/18/2011. (erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 07-cv-02503-WJM-MJW STEVEN A. STENDER, and INFINITY CLARK STREET OPERATING, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. JAMES A. CARDWELL, et al., Defendants. ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Court Appointed Arbitrator (ECF No. 147). In their Reply in support of this motion, Plaintiffs represent to the Court that on April 8, 2011, the parties sent joint letters to prospective arbitrators. Plaintiffs suggest that the Court provide a 30-day window from that date for the parties to jointly retain an arbitrator, at the end of which the parties would file a Joint Status Report apprising the Court of their efforts. If, at that time, the parties have not retained an arbitrator, the Court would rule on Plaintiff’s motion to appoint one. The Court is in accord with Plaintiffs’ suggested course of action. • IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties confer and file, on or before May 9, 2011, a Joint Status Report, apprising the Court of their efforts to jointly retain an arbitrator. If at that time the parties have not retained an arbitrator, the Court will rule on Plaintiff’s Motion for Court Appointed Arbitrator. 1 Dated this 18th day of April, 2011 BY THE COURT: s/ William J. Martínez United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?