Archuleta v. Adams County et al

Filing 246

ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 243 Notice of Appeal by Victor Archuleta, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 01/31/12. (bjrsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 07-cv-02515-MSK-CBS VICTOR S. ARCHULETA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT NANNEY, and JUSTIN SPENCE, Defendants. ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCY Krieger, Judge Plaintiff submitted a Notice of Appeal on January 26, 2012. The court has determined that the document is deficient as described in this order. Plaintiff will be directed to cure the following if he wishes to pursue this appeal. (A) Filing Fee X is not submitted (B) Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24: is not submitted X is missing affidavit is missing certified copy of prisoner’s trust fund statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding this filing is missing required financial information is missing an original signature by the prisoner is not on proper form (must use the court’s current form) other Accordingly, it is 1 ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within 30 days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff filed in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court mail to Plaintiff, together with a copy of this order, an original and one copy of the following forms: Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within 30 days from the date of this order, the court of appeals will be so notified. DATED this 31st day of January, 2012. BY THE COURT: Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?