Mauchlin v. Bier et al
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 203 Motion to Amend Plaintiff's Prospective Trial Exhibits; granting 206 Motion to submit Objections to the Court's Recommendation; granting 208 Motion for Leave to Submit Amended Objections to Recommendation in Place of Prior Objections by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/18/09.(erv, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-02593-CMA-MEH PETER P. MAUCHLIN, Plaintiff, v. BIER, Correctional Supervisor, A. OSAGE, Physicians Assistant, DALGLEISH, EMT, BARRY, Correctional Supervisor, HAM, Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE 1, Correctional Officer, JOHN DOE 2, Medical Officer, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 18, 2009. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Plaintiff's Prospective Trial Exhibits/Documents [filed November 12, 2009; docket #203] is denied without prejudice pending the District Court's adjudication of this Court's Recommendation on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court construes Plaintiff's Request for Corrections to the Court's Report and Recommendations (Doc. #200) [filed November 12, 2009; docket #206] as Plaintiff's objections to the pending Recommendation on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. To the extent Plaintiff seeks to submit objections to the Court's Recommendation, the Motion is granted. Defendants' Motion for Leave to Submit Amended Objections to Recommendation in Place of Prior Objections [filed November 13, 2009; docket #208] is granted. Even though Plaintiff opposes the request, the Court finds that in the interests of justice, Defendants should be permitted to file amended Objections. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter the Objections located at Docket #208-2 and the accompanying unpublished opinion located at Docket #208-3.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?