Arocho v. Lappin et al

Filing 254

MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs pleading titled Temporary Injunction Order 247 and Motion Requesting Temporary Restraining Order 248 are DENIED. Plaintiff shall not file pleadings in this closed case absent direction from the Court, e.g., Order 252 . By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/22/2011.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-02603-REB-KLM NORBERTO PEREZ AROCHO, Plaintiff, v. S. NAFZINGER, Clinical Director, and HARLEY LAPPIN, Federal Bureau of Prison - Director, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s pleading titled “Temporary Injunction Order” [Docket No. 247; Filed June 16, 2011] and Motion Requesting Temporary Restraining Order [Docket No. 248; Filed June 20, 2011] (“the Motions”). This case was closed on June 13, 2011 after summary judgment was entered in favor of Defendants [Docket No. 242]. While pending, the matter related to medical care Plaintiff received while incarcerated at a prison facility in Colorado. The Motions pertain to Plaintiff’s alleged lack of medical care and mistreatment after he was transferred to a prison facility in Missouri. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED. This case is closed. Moreover, the Motions relate to events that were not at issue while the case was pending. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks judicial intervention for his present circumstances, he must exhaust his administrative remedies and file a new lawsuit in the appropriate jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall not file pleadings in this closed case absent direction from the Court, e.g., Order [#252]. Dated: June 22, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?