Arocho v. Lappin et al
Filing
254
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs pleading titled Temporary Injunction Order 247 and Motion Requesting Temporary Restraining Order 248 are DENIED. Plaintiff shall not file pleadings in this closed case absent direction from the Court, e.g., Order 252 . By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/22/2011.(sah, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02603-REB-KLM
NORBERTO PEREZ AROCHO,
Plaintiff,
v.
S. NAFZINGER, Clinical Director, and
HARLEY LAPPIN, Federal Bureau of Prison - Director,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s pleading titled “Temporary Injunction
Order” [Docket No. 247; Filed June 16, 2011] and Motion Requesting Temporary
Restraining Order [Docket No. 248; Filed June 20, 2011] (“the Motions”). This case was
closed on June 13, 2011 after summary judgment was entered in favor of Defendants
[Docket No. 242]. While pending, the matter related to medical care Plaintiff received while
incarcerated at a prison facility in Colorado. The Motions pertain to Plaintiff’s alleged lack
of medical care and mistreatment after he was transferred to a prison facility in Missouri.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED. This case is closed.
Moreover, the Motions relate to events that were not at issue while the case was pending.
To the extent that Plaintiff seeks judicial intervention for his present circumstances, he must
exhaust his administrative remedies and file a new lawsuit in the appropriate jurisdiction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall not file pleadings in this closed case
absent direction from the Court, e.g., Order [#252].
Dated: June 22, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?