Mohammed v. Gonzales et al

Filing 302

ORDER granting 299 Unopposed Motion for a 45-Day Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Written Discovery Requests and 300 Renewed Joint Motion for an Order Setting a Scheduling Conference. The defendants may have toand including 12/5/ 2013, to respond to the plaintiff's written discovery requests, including the amended requests for production of documents referred to in paragraph 3 of the Motion to Extend. A scheduling conference isset for 10/23/2013, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/18/2013. (klyon, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 07-cv-02697-MSK-BNB
KHALFAN KHAMIS MOHAMMED,
Plaintiff,
v.
ERIC HOLDER, the U.S. Attorney General,
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of BOP,
HARRELL WATTS, Administr. Of National Inmate Appeals,
DAVID BERKEBILE, ADX Warden, and
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the following:
(1)

Unopposed Motion for a 45-Day Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s

Written Discovery Requests [Doc. # 299, filed 10/16/2013] (the “Motion to Extend”); and
(2)

Renewed Joint Motion for an Order Setting a Scheduling Conference [Doc. #

300, filed 10/16/2013] (the “Renewed Motion”).
Good cause having been shown, including particularly the stay of discovery previously
entered, Order [Doc. # 283],
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

The Motion to Extend [Doc. # 299] is GRANTED. The defendants may have to

and including December 5, 2013, to respond to the plaintiff’s written discovery requests,
including the amended requests for production of documents referred to in paragraph 3 of the

Motion to Extend; and
(2)

The Renewed Motion [Doc. # 300] is GRANTED. A scheduling conference is

set for October 23, 2013, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United
States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. In addressing the remaining discovery
required and its scheduling, the parties shall heed the district judge’s directive that “the Court
intends that all remaining pretrial proceedings in this case will be expedited to the maximum
extent possible, such that the case will proceed to trial at the earliest possible date,”
Memorandum [Doc. # 301, filed 10/17/2013, and will be held to their representation that any
remaining pretrial proceedings “will not interfere with the Final Pretrial Conference,” Renewed
Motion [Doc. # 300] at ¶3, set for January 7, 2014.
Dated October 18, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge

2