Sattar v. Gonzales et al

Filing 196

MINUTE ORDER granting 194 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint and to Join Additional Defendants. Plaintiff's 194 -1 Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint and attached exhibits are accepted for filing as of the date of this Minute Order. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 6/9/11.(mnf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-02698-WDM-KLM AHMED ABDEL SATTAR, Plaintiff, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity, HARLEY LAPPIN, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his official capacity, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator of National Inmate Appeals for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his official capacity, BLAKE DAVIS, Warden, the United States Penitentiary-Administrative Maximum, in his official capacity, UNKNOWN FBI AGENTS 1-5, in their official capacities, MICHAEL NALLEY, Regional Director, North Central Region, in his official capacity, and JOHN DOES 1-5, in their official capacities, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend and Supplement Complaint and to Join Additional Defendants [Docket No. 194; Filed June 7, 2011] (the “Motion”). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint [Docket No. 194-1] and attached exhibits are accepted for filing as of the date of this Minute Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the caption in this case is amended based on the filing of the Second Amended Complaint to appear as it does at the top of this Minute Order. Dated: June 9, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?