Beylik v. Estep et al

Filing 49

ORDER STRIKING 46 Advisory of Complaint and Request for Restraint filed by Thomas John Beylik, 48 Notice Advisory Denial of Parole filed by Thomas John Beylik, in accordance with this Courts October 7, 2008 Order. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 2/17/09. (erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 07-cv-02710-WYD THOMAS JOHN BEYLIK, Applicant, v. AL ESTEP, Warden, Respondent. ORDER STRIKING PLEADINGS This matter is before the Court on several pro se pleading filed by Petitioner including the "Interpleader Order for Injunction Under 28§2361 Plaintiffs [sic] Advisory of Complaint and Request for Restraint," filed January 26, 2009 [#46] and the "Plaintiffs [sic] Advisory Denial of Parole," filed February 11, 2009 [#48]. On October 7, 2008, I Ordered Petitioner to refrain from filing any further pleadings in the instant action that do not address the denial of his parole, and that any future pleadings that are not related to his denial of parole claim will be stricken. The two pleadings referenced above are primarily unrelated to the relief sought in the instant action; they address Petitioner's conditions of confinement and request relief not properly raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 action. To the extent Petitioner requests that his wife be added as a Co-Petitioner in this action, that request is inappropriate and is denied. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED the Petitioner's "Interpleader Order for Injunction Under 28§2361 Plaintiffs [sic] Advisory of Complaint and Request for Restraint," filed January 26, 2009 [#46] and the "Plaintiffs [sic] Advisory Denial of Parole," filed February 11, 2009 [#48] are STRICKEN in accordance with this Court's October 7, 2008 Order. Dated: February 17, 2009 BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel Chief United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?