RCL Properties, Inc. et al v. USA et al

Filing 70

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 67 Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time for Designation of Experts; granting 68 parties stipulated Motion Re: Protective Order. The parties shall file a stipulated protective order, or Plaintiffs shall file a motion related thereto, on or before 01/16/2008 by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 01/06/2009.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-00055-LTB-KLM (Consolidated with 08-cv-00056-LTB-KLM; 08-cv00473-LTB-KLM; and 08-cv-00474-LTB-KLM) RCL PROPERTIES, INC., KOZAD PROPERTIES, LTD., GLENHILLS RANCH, LTD., AMY HILL KOZELSKY, BOBBY F. HILL, and DOROTHY A. HILL, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time for Designation of Experts [Docket No. 67; Filed December 31, 2008] ("Motion No. 67") and the parties' Stipulated Motion Re: Protective Order [Docket No. 68; Filed December 31, 2008] ("Motion No. 68"). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Motion No. 67 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. To the extent that Plaintiffs request a two-week extension of time to designate their experts, the Motion is granted. Plaintiffs shall designate their experts on or before January 15, 2009. To the extent that Plaintiffs request a forty-five day extension of time to designate an expert in the field of statistics, the Motion is denied without prejudice. Plaintiffs inform the Court that as to this request, "Plaintiffs have been unable to discuss the additional extension of time for the potential expert in the field of statistics, and Defendant has not consented to such extension of time." Motion [#67] at 2. As such, the Motion does not comply with D.C. Colo. L. Civ. R. 7.1(A) in that Plaintiffs failed to satisfy their duty to confer regarding this portion of the requested relief. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Motion No. 68 is GRANTED. The parties shall file a stipulated protective order, or Plaintiffs shall file a motion related thereto, on or before January 16, 2008. Dated: January 6, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?