Watson et al v. Dillon Companies, Inc. et al

Filing 691

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 3/12/2012. Granting 687 Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order Precluding and Preventing Attempted Improper Out-Of-Time Fact Discovery by Defendants and for Emergency Telephonic Hearing Thereon. The subject Subpoenas are quashed. (Court Reporter: FTR - Ellen E. Miller) (mjwcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer Civil Action No.: 08-cv-00091-WYD-CBS Date: March 12, 2012 FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402 Courtroom Deputy: Ellen E. Miller WAYNE WATSON, and MARY WATSON, Steven E. Crick Andrew K. Smith Plaintiffs, v. DILLON COMPANIES, INC., et al., and BIRDS EYE FOOD, INC., Brett M. Godfrey Paul J. Rupprecht Kenneth J. Barrish Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER HEARING: TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING Court in session: 1:40 p.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. The Court raises Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order Precluding and Preventing Attempted Improper Out-Of-Time Fact Discovery by Defendants and for Emergency Telephonic Hearing Thereon [Docket No. 687, Filed March 09, 2012] for argument. Argument by Andrew Smith on behalf of Plaintiffs. Argument by Brett Godfrey on behalf of Defendants. ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PRECLUDING AND PREVENTING ATTEMPTED IMPROPER OUT-OF-TIME FACT DISCOVERY BY DEFENDANTS AND FOR EMERGENCY TELEPHONIC HEARING THEREON [Docket No. 687, filed March 09, 2012] is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record. The subject Subpoenas are QUASHED. HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: 1:57 p.m. Total time in court: 00:17 To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?