Watson et al v. Dillon Companies, Inc. et al
Filing
691
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 3/12/2012. Granting 687 Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order Precluding and Preventing Attempted Improper Out-Of-Time Fact Discovery by Defendants and for Emergency Telephonic Hearing Thereon. The subject Subpoenas are quashed. (Court Reporter: FTR - Ellen E. Miller) (mjwcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action No.: 08-cv-00091-WYD-CBS
Date: March 12, 2012
FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402
Courtroom Deputy: Ellen E. Miller
WAYNE WATSON, and
MARY WATSON,
Steven E. Crick
Andrew K. Smith
Plaintiffs,
v.
DILLON COMPANIES, INC., et al., and
BIRDS EYE FOOD, INC.,
Brett M. Godfrey
Paul J. Rupprecht
Kenneth J. Barrish
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING
Court in session:
1:40 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
The Court raises Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order Precluding and Preventing Attempted
Improper Out-Of-Time Fact Discovery by Defendants and for Emergency Telephonic Hearing
Thereon [Docket No. 687, Filed March 09, 2012] for argument.
Argument by Andrew Smith on behalf of Plaintiffs.
Argument by Brett Godfrey on behalf of Defendants.
ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER PRECLUDING AND
PREVENTING ATTEMPTED IMPROPER OUT-OF-TIME FACT
DISCOVERY BY DEFENDANTS AND FOR EMERGENCY TELEPHONIC
HEARING THEREON [Docket No. 687, filed March 09, 2012] is GRANTED
for reasons as set forth on the record. The subject Subpoenas are QUASHED.
HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: 1:57 p.m. Total time in court: 00:17
To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at
(303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?