Bustos v. Lappin et al

Filing 304

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 302 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Sur Reply..., by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/20/2010. (mehcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-00153-LTB-MEH JERRY LEE BUSTOS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN DOE #1, individually and officially, JOHN DOE #2, individually and officially, JOHN DOE #3, individually and officially, and A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on September 20, 2010. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Sur Reply . . . [filed September 17, 2010; docket #302] is denied without prejudice with leave to re-file for failure to comply fully with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The Court reminds the parties of their continuing obligations to comply fully with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo. 2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?