Davis v. Andujar et al

Filing 49

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motion Hearing held on 3/4/2009. Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Disclosure, Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 37, With Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Compel [Document #43 , filed December 31, 2008] is DENIED. Discovery is extended to March 12, 2009 for the sole purpose of allowing Plaintiff to submit one (1) additional Interrogatory and one (1) additional Request for Production of Document. Defendant shall have up to March 24, 2009 to respond. Plaintiff shall have ten (10) days after receipt of the response to file any motion, if appropriate. (FTR - Debra Brown) (kmtcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 08-cv-00245-MSK-KMT FT R Debra Brown, Deputy Clerk Pro se (Telephone) Plaintiffs. v. W ILFREDO ANDUJAR, et al. Defendants. Thomas G. Bigler Date: March 04, 2009 BENJAMIN DAVIS COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER MOTIONS HEARING Court in Session: 10:02 a.m. Court calls case. Appearance by Benjamin Davis, Plaintiff, pro se by telephone and of Defendant's counsel in person. At issue, Request for production of document No. 3: ORDERED: Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel Disclosure, Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. Rule 37, With Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Compel" [Document #43, filed December 31, 2008] is DENIED. Discovery is extended to March 12, 2009 for the sole purpose of allowing Plaintiff to submit one (1) additional Interrogatory and one (1) additional Request for Production of Document. Defendant shall have up to March 24, 2009 to respond. Plaintiff shall have ten (10) days after receipt of the response to file any motion, if appropriate. ORDERED: Court in recess: 10:27 a.m. Total In-Court Time 0:25; hearing concluded * T o obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery W o o d s Reporting at (303) 825-6119.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?