White River Village, LLP, et al., v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, et al.,

Filing 644

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 641 Plaintiffs' Motion to Modify Proposed Deposition Schedule, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/28/2014. (cpear)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Case No. 08-cv-00248-REB-MEH
(Consolidated with Civil Action No. 08-cv-00359-REB-BNB)
WHITE RIVER VILLAGE, LLP, and
WHITE RIVER TOWNHOMES, LLC,
Plaintiffs/Counter Defendants,
v.
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND,
Defendant/Counter Claimant/Third-Party Plaintiff,
and
HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC., a Colorado Corporation,
Consolidated Defendant,
v.
JONATHAN REED & ASSOCIATES, INC.,
S&S JOINT VENTURE,
CLASS CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
BELLAVISTA BUILDERS,
CRUZAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
RENTERIA ROOFING,
EC CONTRACTORS, LLC,
M.M. SKYLINE CONTRACTING, INC., a/k/a Skyline Contracting,
DEKKER/PERICH/SABATINI, LTD.,
Third-Party Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 28, 2014.
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Modify Proposed Deposition Schedule [filed April 25, 2014; docket
#641] is denied without prejudice for failing to sufficiently explain the need to delay certain
depositions indefinitely. Doing so may, indeed, affect the current discovery cutoff, despite
Plaintiff’s statement to the contrary.