Smith v. Ebel et al

Filing 2

ORDER of Recusal. Judge Ebel recuses himself and directs that this case shall be reassigned. Signed by Judge David M. Ebel on 2/7/2008. (llk, )

Download PDF
-KMT Smith v. Ebel et al Doc. 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO CASE NO. 08-cv-00251-DME-KMT KENNETH L. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. HON. DAVID M. EBEL, in his official capacity as Judge of THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO; THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO, THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, THE COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS, THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO, and JOHN DOES 1-99, Defendants. ORDER OF RECUSAL THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. I am a senior active member of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, both of which are named as Defendants in this civil action, as well as myself in my capacity as a Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Accordingly, my impartiality might reasonably be questioned, and the appearance of impropriety may very well exist, warranting the sua sponte recusal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a)1 and Canon 3C(1) of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, 175 F.R.D. 364, 368 (1998). The standard for impartiality under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) is an objective one, requiring recusal only "if a reasonable person, knowing all of the facts, would harbor doubts about the judge's impartiality." United States v. Cooley, 1 F.3d 985, 993 (10th Cir. 1993) (citations omitted). 1 Dockets.Justia.com IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. 2. The undersigned judge recuses hereafter in this case; and That this case shall be reassigned as provided by D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1. DATED THIS 7th day of February, 2008. BY THE COURT: s/ David M. Ebel David M. Ebel Circuit Court Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?