Nasious v. Denver, City and County of et al

Filing 66

MINUTE ORDER granting 64 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Reply in Objection of Defendants 2nd Motion to Dismiss and to Strike Or, in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply 61 MOTION to Strike 42 MOTION to Dismiss Party Nurse Rosie Pagliano. Accordingly, document 61 is STRICKEN. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/15/09.(erv, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 08­cv­00275­ZLW­KMT JOHN NASIOUS, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER - Denver Sheriffs [sic] Department, SHERIFF STRONG, Denver Sheriffs [sic] Department, in his official and individual capacity, NURSE ROSIE PAGLIANO - Denver Sheriffs [sic] Department, in her official and individual capacity, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA Defendants Pagliano's "Motion to Strike `Plaintiff's Reply in Objection of Defendant's 2nd Motion to Dismiss and to Strike' Or, in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to File Sur-reply" (Doc. No. 64, filed April 14, 2008) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's "Motion to Strike Nurse Pagliano's Motion to Dismiss" (Doc. No. 54) has been construed as a response to Defendant Pagliano's motion to dismiss. (See Doc. No. 56.) Defendant filed her reply on March 24, 2009. (Doc. No. 60.) "Plaintiff's Reply in Objection of Defendant's 2nd Motion to Dismiss and to Strike" (Doc. No. 61) is essentially a sur-response. Without being granted permission from the court, Plaintiff may not file a sur-response. D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1. Accordingly, document number 61 is STRICKEN. Dated: April 15, 2009