Bullock v. Wayne et al

Filing 138

ORDER granting to the extent described in this Order 136 Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Rebecca E. Bullock's Unopposed Motion to Reconsider Order Entering Judgment Against Counterclaim Defendant, Rebecca Bullock. The stipulated dismissa l 130 is accepted and counterclaim plaintiff John D. Waynes counterclaims against counterclaim defendant Rebecca E. Bullock are dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own costs as to the counterclaims. Judgment shall be amended to reflect the fact that judgment enters in favor of John D. Wayne and Basin Surveying, Inc. as defendants and against Rebecca E. Bullock as plaintiff. Defendants are entitled to costs associated with plaintiffs claims against them. No other amendments to the judgment are to be made, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/10/09.(ebs, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 08-cv-00339-PAB-KMT REBECCA E. BULLOCK, Plaintiff, v. JOHN D. WAYNE and BASIN SURVEYING, INC., Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ It is ORDERED that plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Rebecca E. Bullock's Unopposed Motion to Reconsider Order Entering Judgment Against Counterclaim Defendant, Rebecca Bullock [Docket No. 136] is GRANTED to the extent described herein. It is further ORDERED that the stipulated dismissal [Docket No. 130] is accepted and counterclaim plaintiff John D. Wayne's counterclaims against counterclaim defendant Rebecca E. Bullock are dismissed with prejudice. The parties shall bear their own costs as to the counterclaims. It is further ORDERED that the judgment shall be amended to reflect the fact that judgment enters in favor of John D. Wayne and Basin Surveying, Inc. as defendants

and against Rebecca E. Bullock as plaintiff. Defendants are entitled to costs associated with plaintiff's claims against them pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 and 28 U.S.C. § 1920. No other amendments to the judgment are to be made.

DATED July 10, 2009. BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge

2