Pearson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrack)

Filing 106

Order. Plaintiff shall submit a brief on the proper rate of prejudgment interest on or before 02/05/2010; Defendant shall submit a response brief on this issue on or before 02/12/2010; and a reply brief shall be ordered if deemed appropriate. The par ties shall file a stipulation and proposed order regarding back pay and reinstatement on or before 02/03/2010. A further status hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, 02/24/2010 at 9:00 a.m.. Plaintiffs Motion for Attorney Fees, Costs and Pre/Post Judgment Interest 99 shall be HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further notice from the Court. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 01/29/2010.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 08-cv-00406-LTB-KMT WILLIAM R. PEARSON a/k/a BILLY RAY PEARSON, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK), Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ As further set forth on the record at the hearing held on January 29, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff shall submit a brief on the proper rate of prejudgment interest on or before February 5, 2010; Defendant shall submit a response brief on this issue on or before February 12, 2010; and a reply brief shall be ordered if deemed appropriate; 2. The parties shall file a stipulation and proposed order regarding back pay and reinstatement on or before February 3, 2010. 3. A further status hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, February 24, 2010 at 9:00 a.m.; and 4. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney' Fees, Costs and Pre/Post Judgment Interest [Doc # 99] shall be HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further notice from the Court. Dated: January 29 , 2010 in Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?