USA v. Sethi et al

Filing 68

ORDER: On or before September 9, 2010, the parties shall file either: A stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); or (2) A status report addressing why the stipulation has not been filed, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/3/10. (bnbcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 08-cv-00418-BNB-MEH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROHIT SETHI, CHARLES ELROY VANCURA, a/k/a CHUCK VANCURA, and JAMES BRYAN VANCURA, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ The parties have filed a Stipulated Settlement Agreement [Doc. # 67, filed 9/2/2010] which states at ¶27 that "[u]pon the filing of this Stipulated Settlement Agreement, the parties shall file a Stipulation of Dismissal, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)." No such stipulation has been received. IT IS ORDERED that on or before September 9, 2010, the parties shall file either: (1) (2) A stipulation of dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); or A status report addressing why the stipulation has not been filed.

Dated September 3, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge