Davis v. Arrellano et al

Filing 42

ORDER granting 38 Motion for Reconsideration that within 15 days of this Order the Respondents shall provide Applicant with a copy of the transcripts detailed in his Motion to Reconsider; granting 37 Motion for Extension of Time, Applicant shall file a traverse, if any, on or before June 30, 2009. by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/13/09.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-00484-CMA-KLM DWIGHT D. DAVIS, Applicant, v. MICHAEL ARRELLANO, Warden, AVCF, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Applicant's Motion for Extension or Enlargement of Time [Docket 37; Filed December 23, 2008] and Motion to Reconsider Request for Transcripts and Record of Action [Docket No. 38; Filed December 23, 2008]. In a November 24, 2008 Order, the Court denied Applicant's motion requesting transcripts [Docket No. 36]. I denied the motion because Applicant had not shown a "legitimate and particularized need" for the transcripts. See United States v. Self, 876 F.Supp. 244, 248 (D. Colo. 1995) (citing Jones v. Superintendent, 460 F.2d 150, 153 (4th Cir. 1972). The Court will grant a motion for reconsideration "to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice." Servants of Paraclete v. Does, 204 F.3d 1005, 1012 (10th Cir. 2000). The motion must be based on "arguments that were previously raised but were overlooked by the Court-`[p]arties are not free to relitigate issues that the Court has already decided.'" Klein-Becker USA. LLC v. All Web LLC, 2007 WL 2084337, at *1 (D. Utah 2007)(quoting United States v. Jasin, 292 F. Supp. 2d 670, 676 (E.D. Pa. 2003). I find that the Applicant has now show a "legitimate and particularized need" for the transcripts. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the Court may order that the Respondents furnish transcripts. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider [No. 38] is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that within 15 days of this Order the Respondents shall provide Applicant with a copy of the transcripts detailed in his Motion to Reconsider. Respondents may either copy the transcripts at their expense and send them to Applicant, or loan the record to Applicant for his use in preparing his traverse. If the record is loaned to Applicant, he shall be supervised by an appropriate official of the correctional facility while using it. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant's Motion for Extension or Enlargement of Time [No. 37] is GRANTED. Applicant shall file a traverse, if any, on or before June 30, 2009. Dated: April 13, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?