Registry Systems International, Ltd. v. Hamm et al

Filing 183

MINUTE ORDER granting 179 Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. The Rule 16 Scheduling Order is amended as set forth in this Minute Order. Discovery due by 9/30/2009, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/30/09.(ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-00495-PAB-MJW REGISTRY SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Plaintiff, v. KIM KEELING, Defendant, and VINCENT HAMM, KAREN HAMM, AIM HIGH!, INC., KAIM CHIGH, LLC, and I DOMAIN SOURCE LTD., Defendants, Counterclaimants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. EDWARD J. SWEENEY, CHARLES A. SWEENEY, and, CAPITAL NETWORKS , PTY, LTD., a/k/a PACNAMES, LTD. Third-Party Defendants. MINUTE ORDER MICHAEL J. WATANABE United States Magistrate Judge It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order (docket no. 179) is GRANTED finding good cause shown. The Rule 16 Scheduling Order is amended as follows: 1. The deadline to complete discovery is extended up to and including September 30, 2009. All discovery requests must be served sufficient in advance of this date for responses to be due by the close of fact discovery, and no later than August 3, 2009; 2 2. All discovery set forth herein shall be limited to only the Third-Party Plaintiffs and Defendants regarding the third­party claims and counterclaims; That Third-Party Defendants are limited to the deposition of Vincent Hamm (no longer than 5 hours) and the deposition of Karen Hamm (no longer than 2 hours). Third-Party Plaintiffs are limited to a single deposition of Edward Sweeney (no longer than 5 hours). All depositions shall take place in Denver, Colorado; and, That Third-Party Defendants and Plaintiffs are limited to 20 interrogatories and 20 request for production of documents per side. 3. 4. Date: June 30, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?