Registry Systems International, Ltd. v. Hamm et al
MINUTE ORDER denying 83 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order. The plaintiff has failed to demonstrate "extreme hardship" for having Mr. Sweeney appear in Colorado for his deposition, and the remainder of Plaintiff's arguments are without merit, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/3/09.(ebs, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-00495-PAB-MJW REGISTRY SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Plaintiff, v. VINCENT HAMM, et al., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order (docket no. 83) is DENIED. Plaintiff RSI chose to initiate this litigation in Colorado. Further, the deposition of the Plaintiff or its agent is generally appropriate at the litigation forum. See Clem v. Allied Van Lines Int'l Corp., 102 F.R.D. 938, 939 (S.D.N.Y. 1984); Srebnik v. Dean, 2006 WL 2331014 (D. Colo. June 20, 2006). Here, I find that Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate "extreme hardship" for having Mr. Sweeney appear in Colorado for his deposition, and I further find that the remainder of Plaintiff's arguments are without merit. Date: March 3, 2009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?