Dolin et al v. Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 64

ORDER: re: denying 56 MOTION for Protective Order Regarding Deposition filed by Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. The plaintiffs requests for the award of attorneys fees and costs associated with resisting the Motion and with deposing Mr. Kaminski at a later date is DENIED. Mr. Kaminski shall make himself available for a deposition at a date and time as the parties and Mr. Kaminski may agree, but not later than November 6, 2009, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/1/09. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 08-cv-00675-WYD-BNB ROBERT A. DOLIN, and LISA DOLIN, Plaintiffs, v. CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC., and MUTUAL SERVICE CORPORATION, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the Motion of Defendants Contemporary Financial Solutions, Inc. and Mutual Service Corporation for a Protective Order Regarding the Deposition of Dennis Kaminski [Doc. # 56, filed 9/21/2009] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs' requests for the award of attorneys fees and costs associated with resisting the Motion and with deposing Mr. Kaminski at a later date is DENIED, the Motion being substantially justified. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Kaminski shall make himself available for a deposition at a date and time as the parties and Mr. Kaminski may agree, but not later than November 6, 2009. Dated October 1, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?