Parker v. Ritter et al

Filing 228

MINUTE ORDER granting 226 Plaintiff's Motion for PDF Formats and Forms, Amended Complaint. The Clerk is directed to mail the Courts Confidential Settlement Statement instructions to Plaintiff, a copy of which is attached. The Clerk is also di rected to a mail a copy of the 191 Amended Complaint to Plaintiff. The Court reminds Plaintiff that because the pleading amendment deadline has expired, no further amendments of his Amended Complaint shall be permitted, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 09/01/09. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1)(wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-00737-MSK-KLM KEITH PARKER, Plaintiff, v. MR. BILL RITTER, Governor of the State of Colorado, MR. ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director, MR. MARK BROADUS, MR. PAUL HOLLENBECK MR. ARELLANO, CAPTAIN HALL, MR. LEONARD VIGIL, MR. DAVID M. ZUPAN, MRS. D. WEBSTER, LT. MCCORMICK, MR. ENREQUIZ, LT. PIPER, MRS. SUSAN JONES, MRS. JILL HOGGARTH, MR. DR. [sic] MCHAUD, and LT. ROBERT STEINBECK, Defendant(s). _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for PDF Formats and Forms, Amended Complaint [Docket No. 226; Filed August 28, 2009] (the "Motion"). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to mail the Court's Confidential Settlement Statement instructions to Plaintiff, a copy of which is attached. The Clerk is also directed to a mail a copy of the Amended Complaint [Docket No. 191] to Plaintiff. The Court reminds Plaintiff that because the pleading amendment deadline has expired, no further amendments of his Amended Complaint shall be permitted. Dated: September 1, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?