Parker v. Ritter et al

Filing 274

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 225 Motion for Exhibits to be Returned. To the extent that Plaintiff chooses to renew his request, he must provide sufficient information for the Court to locate the photograph at issue on the docket. by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/02/2009.(klmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-00737-MSK-KLM KEITH PARKER, Plaintiff, v. MR. BILL RITTER, Governor of the State of Colorado, MR. ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director, MR. MARK BROADUS, MR. PAUL HOLLENBECK MR. ARELLANO, CAPTAIN HALL, MR. LEONARD VIGIL, MR. DAVID M. ZUPAN, MRS. D. WEBSTER, LT. MCCORMICK, MR. ENREQUIZ, LT. PIPER, MRS. SUSAN JONES, MRS. JILL HOGGARTH, MR. DR. [sic] MCHAUD, and LT. ROBERT STEINBECK, Defendant(s). _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion Request for Exhibit's [sic] to Be Retured [sic] [Docket No. 225; Filed August 28, 2009] (the "Motion"). Although the Motion is less than clear, Plaintiff appears to seek the return of a photograph he submitted in conjunction with a pleading titled "First Motion to Strike the Defendants [sic] Motion to Dismiss His Complaint." The Court located a pleading on the docket with this title [Docket No. 217]; however, the pleading did not contain a photograph. In addition, the Court reviewed the docket and could not locate a photograph attached to any of Plaintiff's recent pleadings. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED without prejudice. To the extent that Plaintiff chooses to renew his request, he must provide sufficient information for the Court to locate the photograph at issue on the docket. Dated: November 2, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?