Sanderson v. Aurora, City of et al
ORDER. The recommendation is accepted. Defendants Motion to Dismissfor Plaintiffs Failure to Comply with Courts Order 74 is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 08/27/2009.(sah, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 08-cv-00756-LTB-BNB
RONALD SANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER HARROLD BRANT, OFFICER DAVE KREIGER, OFFICER CRAIG MORGAN, OTHER UNKNOWN AURORA POLICE OFFICERS, and POLICE S.W.A.T. MEMBERS, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on August 6, 2009 (Doc 76). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Plaintiff's Failure to Comply with Court's Order (Doc 74) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: August 27, 2009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?