Kellar v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs

Filing 159

ORDER granting 152 Plaintiffs (Opposed) Motion For: Leave to Present Newly Discovered Evidence Of: Plaintiffs (Additional) Economic Damages, filed January 5, 2010 152 is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff seeks to add the exhibits attached to the motion to Plaintiffs Exhibit List. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may object to the admissibility of the new exhibits at trial. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 1/25/2010.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 08-cv-00761-WYD-KLM RICHARD D. KELLAR, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN'S AFFAIRS, a federal agency of United States, Defendant. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's (Opposed) Motion For: Leave to Present Newly Discovered Evidence Of: Plaintiff's (Additional) Economic Damages, filed January 5, 2010 [#152]. Defendant filed a response on January 15, 2010. It appears from the motion that Plaintiff is seeking to add two additional exhibits to the exhibit list set forth in the Final Pretrial Order entered October 20, 2009. Defendant does not object to this request, but objects to any amendment of the text of the Final Pretrial Order, and reserves the right to object to the admissibility of the new exhibits. Upon consideration of the motion and the file herein, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's (Opposed) Motion For: Leave to Present Newly Discovered Evidence Of: Plaintiff's (Additional) Economic Damages, filed January 5, 2010 [#152] is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff seeks to add the exhibits attached to the motion to Plaintiff's Exhibit List. It is -1- FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may object to the admissibility of the new exhibits at trial. Dated: January 25, 2010 BY THE COURT: s/ Wiley Y. Daniel Wiley Y. Daniel Chief United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?