Byrd v. USA et al
ORDER to Cure Deficiency re 74 Notice of Appeal by Trenson Byrd, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 07/14/09. Appellant has 30 days to either pay the filing fee or file a proper 1915 motion with district court.(bjrsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-00779-RPM TRENSON L. BYRD, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and SUZANNE STEIGERWALD, Defendants. ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCY Matsch, Senior Judge Plaintiff submitted a Notice of Appeal on July 14, 2009 . The court has determined that the document is deficient as described in this order. Plaintiff will be directed to cure the following if he wishes to pursue this appeal. (A) (B) Filing Fee is not submitted Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24: is not submitted X is not on proper form (must use the court's current form) is missing original signature by plaintiff/petitioner on motion is missing affidavit affidavit is incomplete is missing original signature by plaintiff/petitioner on affidavit affidavit is not notarized or is not properly notarized X other
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within 30 days from the 1
date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff filed in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court mail to Plaintiff, together with a copy of this order, an original and one copy of the following forms: Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the court of appeals will be so notified. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 14th day of July, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch SENIOR JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?