MedCorp, Inc. v. Pinpoint Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 184

ORDER: Plaintiff shall have through 10/26/2009 in which to file a response to the 173 Renewed Motion to Seal Unredacted Version of Medcorps Combined Motion and Memorandum for Sanctions Against Zoll. If a response in opposition is filed, Defendants shall have through 10/30/2009 in which to file a reply. If Plaintiff indicates that it does not oppose the motion, or otherwise fails to file a timely response, a ruling on the motion shall then enter, by Special Master Kevin D. Allen on 10/22/2009. (wjc, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-00867-MSK-KLM MEDCORP, INC., an Ohio corporation, Plaint iff, v. PINPOINT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, and ZOLL DATA SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation Defendants ORDER ENTERED BY SPECIAL MASTER KEVIN D. ALLEN This matter is before the Special Master on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Seal Unredacted Version of Medcorp's Combined Motion and Memorandum for Sanctions Against Zoll [Docket No. 173; Filed October 19, 2009] (the "Renewed Motion"). While the original Motion to Seal Medcorp's Motion for Sanctions (Docket No. 140) was unopposed, that motion was denied in part. The Renewed Motion is not designated as unopposed pursuant to D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1B. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall have through October 26, 2009 in which to file a response to the Renewed Motion. If a response in opposition is filed, Defendants shall have through October 30, 2009 in which to file a reply. If Plaintiff indicates that it does not oppose the motion, or otherwise fails to file a timely response, a ruling on the motion shall then enter. Dated: October 22, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?