Baker v. AirServ Corporation et al

Filing 78

MINUTE ORDER granting 77 Motion to Clarify the Nature and Effect of Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Proposed Exhibits. Objections made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(B) preserve the ability of a party to make such objections at trial. The Court will not rule on such objections until they are made at trial. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 8/10/09. (pabsec)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-00913-PAB-KLM RICHARD BAKER, Plaintiff, v. AIRSERV CORPORATION and UNITED AIRLINES INC., Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer This matter comes before the Court on defendants' Motion to Clarify the Nature and Effect of Plaintiff's Objections to Defendants' Proposed Exhibits [Docket No. 77]. The motion is granted. Objections made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(B) preserve the ability of a party to make such objections at trial. The Court will not rule on such objections until they are made at trial. DATED August 10, 2009.