Hall v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al

Filing 126

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/17/09. (ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No.: 08-cv-00999-DME-MEH AMANDA HALL, Plaintiff, v. ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, et al., Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ______________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff Amanda Hall and Defendants Aristedes Zavaras, Joe Ortiz, Gary Golder, Mark A. Broaadus, Nobel Wallace, Neva Butterfield, Scott Hall, and Michael Caramia (hereinafter referred to as "State Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to the entry of this Protective Order Concerning Confidential Information, specifically regarding the preparation for and trial regarding damages against Defendant Leshawn Terrell, scheduled for April 20-21, 2009, as follows:1 1. This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, materials, and information, including without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, deposition testimony, and other information disclosed pursuant to the disclosure or discovery duties created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and designated as "Confidential" pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order. This Stipulated Protective Order has been negotiated and agreed to between Plaintiff and State Defendants only. Defendant Leshawn Terrell, who is presently a pro se Defendant in this action, has failed to respond to Plaintiff's counsels' efforts to contact him. 1 2. As used in this Protective Order, "document" is defined as provided in Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term. 3. Information designated "CONFIDENTIAL" shall be defined as: (a)Documents and information produced by State Defendants or any of State Defendants' agents or representatives, when designated as "confidential" as provided herein, concerning current or former employees of State Defendants, including personnel or personnel-related documents or internal memoranda or investigation records, or medical records of the Plaintiff related to her incarceration at the Denver Women's Correctional Facility (the "DWCF"); (b) Documents and information produced by or obtained through releases produced by Plaintiff, concerning individual medical, inmate records and personal identification information, shall also be treated as confidential; (c) Documents and information produced by State Defendants or any of State Defendants' agents or representatives concerning any investigations related to this matter concerning current or former inmates' records and personal identification information, including but not limited to documents and information pertaining to investigations conducted by the Colorado Department of Corrections, shall also be treated as confidential. 4. CONFIDENTIAL information shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose except the preparation for the trial regarding damages against Defendant Leshawn Terrell, scheduled for April 20-21, 2009. 5. CONFIDENTIAL documents, materials, and/or information (collectively "CONFIDENTIAL information") shall not, without the consent of the party producing it or further Order of the Court, be disclosed except that such information may be disclosed to: (a) attorneys actively working on this case; 2 (b) persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively working on the case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the preparation for trial, at trial, or at other proceedings in this case; (c) expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this proceeding, to the extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial or other proceedings in this case; (d) the Court and its employees ("Court Personnel"); (e) stenographic reporters who are engaged in proceedings necessarily incident to the conduct of this action; (f) deponents, witnesses, or potential witnesses; and (g) other persons by written agreement of the parties. 6. Prior to disclosing any CONFIDENTIAL information to any person listed above (other than counsel, persons employed by counsel, Court Personnel and stenographic reporters), counsel shall provide such person with a copy of this Protective Order and obtain written agreement from such person that he or she will be bound by its provisions. 7. Documents are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by placing or affixing on them (in a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) the following or other appropriate notice: "CONFIDENTIAL." Any information designated by a party as CONFIDENTIAL must first be reviewed by a lawyer who will certify that the designation as CONFIDENTIAL is based on a good faith belief that the information is confidential or otherwise entitled to protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(7). 8. Whenever a deposition involves the disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL information, the deposition or portions thereof shall be designated as CONFIDENTIAL and shall be subject 3 to the provisions of this Protective Order. Such designation shall be made on the record during the deposition whenever possible, but a party may designate portions of depositions as CONFIDENTIAL after transcription, provided written notice of the designation is promptly given to all counsel of record within thirty (30) days after notice by the court reporter of the completion of the transcript. 9. A party may object to the designation of particular CONFIDENTIAL information by giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information. The written notice shall identify the information to which the objection is made. If the parties cannot resolve the objection within ten (10) business days after the time the notice is received, it shall be the obligation of the party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL to file an appropriate motion requesting that the Court determine whether the disputed information should be subject to the terms of this Protective Order within thirty (30) days of the aforementioned notice. If such a motion is timely filed, the disputed information shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If the designating party fails to file such a motion within the prescribed time, the disputed information shall lose its designation as CONFIDENTIAL and shall not thereafter be treated as CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with this Protective Order. In connection with a motion filed under this provision, the party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL. 10. The terms of this Protective Order shall survive the termination of this action, and all protections of this Protective Order shall remain in full effect in perpetuity. 4 11. This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good cause shown following notice to all parties and an opportunity for them to be heard. STIPULATED TO AND APPROVED AS TO FORM this 16th day of March, 2009. s/ Mari Newman _______________________________ Mari Newman Darold Killmer Althea S. Licht KILLMER, LANE & NEWMAN, LLP 1543 Champa Street, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80202 dkillmer@kln-law.com mnewman@kln-law.com alicht@kln-law.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF s/ Patricia Herron _______________________________ Patricia Herron Assistant Attorney General Civil Litigation and Employment Law Section COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE 1525 Sherman Street, 7th Floor Denver, CO 80203 pat.herron@state.co.us ATTORNEY FOR STATE DEFENDANTS DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of March, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ Michael E. Hegarty Michael E. Hegarty United States Magistrate Judge 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?