Contour Pak, Inc. v. Expedice, Inc.

Filing 87

ORDER granting 78 Motion to Dismiss Claims against Defendant M-C Industries, Inc., d/b/a Polo Custom Products. All claims asserted against Defendant M-C Industries, Inc., d/b/a Polo Custom Products are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs. The caption of this case shall be amended as reflected in the caption in this Order, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/19/09.(ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-01091-PAB-KMT CONTOUR PAK, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. EXPEDICE, INC., a Nebraska corporation, Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT M-C INDUSTRIES, INC., d/b/a POLO CUSTOM PRODUCTS ______________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Motion to Dismiss Claims against Defendant M-C Industries, Inc., d/b/a Polo Custom Products [Docket No. 78]. The Court has reviewed the pleading and is fully advised in the premises. It is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 78] is granted. It is further ORDERED that all claims asserted against Defendant M-C Industries, Inc., d/b/a Polo Custom Products are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. It is further ORDERED that the caption of this case shall be amended as reflected in the caption in this Order. DATED April 19, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?