Tony's Taps, LLC v. PS Enterprises, Inc.

Filing 201

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT PS Enterprises, Inc. and Frank and Robin Schiro, who are the owners thereof, shall pay the sum of $4112.00 to Mr. Freudenberg and the sum of $1459.00 to Mr. Kelly within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, failing which the Court will enter a judgment in favor of each attorney and against each defendant, jointly andseverally, upon request of the attorneys. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 4/21/11. (msksec, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 08-cv-01119-MSK-KLM TONY’S TAPS, LLC, d/b/a Pagosa Brewing Company, Inc., Plaintiff, v. PS ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a Pagosa Pub Works Brewpub, FRANK SCHIRO, and ROBIN SCHIRO, Defendants. ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to Plaintiff’s Counsels’ Affidavit in Support of Attorney Fees (#195) and accompanying exhibits, to which the Defendants objected (#196), and the Plaintiff’s counsel replied (#198). Having reviewed the SAME, the Court FINDS: (1) The Court awarded fees to Plaintiff’s counsel incurred with regard to the filing of the Motion for Entry of Default (#179), the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (#180), and Motion for Default Judgment (#185), which were occasioned by Defendant PS Enterprises, Inc.’s failure to obtain counsel or to request an extension of time to obtain counsel in accordance with the Court’s Order of March 3, 2011 (#177); (2) Although PS Enterprises, Inc. was seeking replacement counsel, it did not advise either the Court or Plaintiff’s counsel of its intention to retain new counsel or its inability to do so by the date specified in the March 3, 2011 Order (#177); (3) Had PS Enterprises, Inc. provided notice to the Court or opposing counsel or requested an extension of time to obtain replacement counsel, the filing of the Motion for Entry of Default (#179), the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (#180), and Motion for Default Judgment (#185) would not have been necessary; (4) Plaintiff is represented by two attorneys, who divided the work associated with the preparation of these motions; (5) No justification has been shown for extensive communication, revision, duplicative research, or review of the work prepared by co-counsel, and, therefore, no allowance is made for same; (6) The time spent by Mr. Kenton Freudenberg for preparation of the Motion for Default (#179) is 10 hours, which the Court finds to the reasonable; (7) The time spent by Mr. Freudenberg in preparation of the Motion for Default Judgment (#185) is 15.7 hours, which the Court finds to be reasonable; (8) There is no objection to Mr. Freudenberg’s hourly rate of $160; thus, the reasonable fees incurred by Mr. Freudenberg are $4112.00; (9) The time spent by Mr. Reid Kelly for preparation of the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (#180) is 7 hours, which the Court finds to be reasonable; (10) The time spent by Mr. Kelly’s paralegal formatting and filing the motions is 3.9 hours, which the Court finds to be reasonable; (11) There is no objection to Mr. Kelly’s hourly rate of $175 or the paralegal’s hourly 2 rate of $60; thus, the reasonable fees incurred by Mr. Kelly and his paralegal are $1459.00; (12) The Court does not find that the charges related to the appearance at a hearing on April 5, 2011 to have been necessitated by these motions, nor did it require the participation of both counsel for the Plaintiff; therefore, no allowance is made. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT PS Enterprises, Inc. and Frank and Robin Schiro, who are the owners thereof, shall pay the sum of $4112.00 to Mr. Freudenberg and the sum of $1459.00 to Mr. Kelly within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, failing which the Court will enter a judgment in favor of each attorney and against each defendant, jointly and severally, upon request of the attorneys. Dated this 21st day of April, 2011 BY THE COURT: Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?