Ruffin v. Village Garden Apartments et al
MINUTE ORDER denying Without Prejudice 36 City of Aurora'a Motion to Dismiss; denying Without Prejudice 41 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 47 Motion to Dismiss by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/2/09.(erv, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No.: 08-cv-01144-WYD-KMT SHAREE RUFFIN, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE GARDEN APARTMENTS, a corporate entity; GLORIA ORTIZ, a/k/a GLORIA MALVEAUX; RAYMOND MALVEAUX, JR.; CELIA CHAVARRIA; OCTIVIOUS FRUCHLER; BARBRA IGLESIAS; CLAUDIA MIGUEL; UNKNOWN ARAPAHOE COUNTY EMPLOYEE, for the Public Housing Authority, an inspector in their official and individual capacity; UNKNOWN ARAPAHOE COUNTY EMPLOYEE, for the Public Housing Authority, an inspector in their official and individual capacity; UNKNOWN AURORA CITY EMPLOYEE, an inspector for the Aurora Housing Authority, in their individual and official capacity; and UNKNOWN AURORA CITY EMPLOYEE, an inspector for the Aurora Housing Authority, in their individual and official capacity, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL In light of the settlement reached in this case, as reflected in Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya's Minute Order of February 25, 2009 [doc. #105], the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Colorado Housing and Finance Authority, Mark Feilmeier, and Thomas Parra [doc. #47, filed August 14, 2008], Motion for More Definite Statement [doc. #41, filed August 1, 2008], and City of Aurora's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(1) and (6) [doc. #36, filed July 31, 2008] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dated: March 2, 2009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?