Irene et al v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al

Filing 99

ORDER denying 88 Plaintiffs' Motion for Additional Sanctions, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/13/10.(gmssl, )

Download PDF
Irene et al v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company et al Doc. 99 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 08-cv-01265-RPM LUIS IRENE and GRETCHEN IRENE, Plaintiffs, v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL SANCTIONS At the hearing held on June 16, 2010, the Court ordered that a new deposition be taken of Robert Nelson on the subject of notes claimed to have been located after the deposition on December 3, 2009. On August 17, 2010, the plaintiffs' filed a motion for additional sanctions, alleging misconduct regarding the production of notes and Mr. Nelson's testimony at his third deposition taken July 9, 2010. The motion has been briefed. The contentions made in the plaintiffs' motion are disputed and may be presented in testimony at trial. This case is to be scheduled for trial at a calendar call on November 19, 2010 at 8:00 a.m. The Court does not intend to resolve issues of credibility of Robert Nelson by conducting a hearing on the new motions for sanctions. As to the attorney's fees to be paid for the deposition, the amount is fixed at $1,050.00. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the motion for additional sanctions is denied [88]. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall forthwith pay $1,050.00 as attorney fees Dockets.Justia.com for the taking of the third deposition of Robert Nelson. Dated: October 13th , 2010 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge . 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?