United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Johnson

Filing 40

ORDER: re: Granting in part and denying in part 34 MOTION to Modify 10 Scheduling Order filed by Kris P. Johnson. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 9/11/2009. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/18/2009 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/1/09. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-01287-PAB-BNB UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Nebraska corporation, Plaintiff, v. KRIS P. JOHNSON, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order [Doc. # 34, filed 8/14/2009] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: DENIED as moot insofar as it seeks to extend the discovery cut-off to allow the deposition of Mr. Hamernick, that deposition having already been concluded; DENIED as moot insofar as it seeks an extension of time to file Rule 702 motions, all such motions having already been filed; and GRANTED to extend the date of the final pretrial conference. The final pretrial conference is set to occur on September 18, 2009, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. A Final Pretrial Order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the court no later than September 11, 2009. Dated September 1, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?