Wilson v. Zavaras et al

Filing 104

MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike 100 is DENIED because theTenth Circuit remanded the case to the District Court to construe Plaintiffs motion for enlargement of time 71 and notice of appeal as a motion under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6) to reopen the time to appeal (Doc. No. 83 at 2, 4) and this court ordered defendants to file a response 85 .By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 12/22/2010.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 08­cv­01355­REB­KMT STEVEN WILSON, Plaintiff, v. CATHY HOLST, in her individual capacity, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA Plaintiff's "Motion to Strike" (Doc. No. 100, filed December 20, 2010) is DENIED because the Tenth Circuit remanded the case to the District Court to "construe Plaintiff's `motion for enlargement of time' (doc. 71) and notice of appeal as a motion under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6) to reopen the time to appeal" (Doc. No. 83 at 2, 4) and this court ordered defendants to file a response (Doc. No. 85). Dated: December 22, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?