Colorado Environmental Coalition et al v. Kempthorne et al
ORDER denying 67 Plaintiff's Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Public Documents and denying 68 Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Extra-Record Materials without prejudice as standalone motions. Court will treat the briefing re: these motions as supplements to parties' brief on the merits and will address those issues in its ruling on the merits, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 9/29/09.(gms, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 08-cv-01460-MSK-KLM COLORADO ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, COLORADO MOUNTAIN CLUB, COLORADO TROUT UNLIMITED, CENTER FOR NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS, ROCK THE EARTH, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNSEL, NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, SIERRA CLUB, THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, and WILDERNESS WORKSHOP, Plaintiffs, v. KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Interior, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, SALLY WISELY, in her official capacity as Colorado State Director of the Bureau of Land Management, and JAMIE L. CONNELL, in her official capacity as Field Manager for the Glenwood Springs Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management, Defendants. and VANTAGE ENERGY PICEANCE LLC, OXY USA, INC., WILLIAMS PRODUCTION RMT, ANTERO RESOURCES PICEANCE CORPORATION, Intervenors ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER DEEMING MOTIONS SUBSUMED INTO BRIEFING ______________________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. The Court's electronic docketing system reflects that the Plaintiffs' Motion to Take
Judicial Notice of Public Documents (# 67) and the Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Extra-Record Materials (# 68) are pending as discrete motions. Resolution of these motions is inextricably tied into consideration of the parties' briefs as to the merits of this dispute and the Court intends to address the issues raised in those motions in to course of its consideration of the merits of this case. Accordingly, for purposes of administrative clarity, the Motions (# 67, 68) are DENIED without prejudice as standalone motions. However, the Court will treat the parties' briefing with regard to these motions as supplements to the parties' briefs on the merits of the dispute here, and will address those issues accordingly in its ruling on the merits. Dated this 29th day of September, 2009 BY THE COURT:
Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?