Fernandez v. Bogert et al

Filing 60

ORDER denying 54 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. By Judge David L. Russell on 08/31/2009.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LISA MARIE BETZ, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. DENVER POLICE OFFICER THOMAS BOGERT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery responses. Doc. No. 54. Plaintiffs' motion is DENIED. The motion was not filed until four (4) months after the discovery cut-off. Hence, the motion is untimely. The original interrogatory and request for production as to which Plaintiffs seek responses were vague. Plaintiffs could and should have clarified them long ago. Finally, at this point, the discovery sought is moot because summary judgment has already been granted in favor of Defendant City and County of Denver and the discovery is not relevant to the one remaining claim against Defendant Bogert. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2009. No. CIV-08-1475-DLR-MJW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?