Fernandez v. Bogert et al
ORDER denying 74 Plaintiff's Motion for Recusal. By Judge David L. Russell on 10/06/2009.(sah, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LISA MARIE BETZ, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. DENVER POLICE OFFICER THOMAS BOGERT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER Plaintiffs' attorney, Derek Cole has filed a frivolous motion for the Judge to recuse himself from the case because his motion for continuance was denied. Plaintiffs' attorney has cited no authority under 28 U.S.C. § 455 or case law which would reasonably suggest that failure to grant a continuance is grounds for recusal. Plaintiffs' motion [Doc. No. 74] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of October, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?