Mountain States Media, LLC et al v. Adams County, Colorado et al

Filing 61

ORDER DENYING 52 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Regarding Qualified Immunity Defense; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 51 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Production of Privilege Log That Meets Requirements of Federal Law by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/23/09.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 08-cv-01513-CMA-BNB MOUNTAIN STATE MEDIA, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and WAYNE OSTERLOO, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. ADAMS COUNTY, COLORADO, a Colorado governmental entity, and ROBERT D. CONEY, an individual, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the following: (1) Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Privilege Log That Meets Requirements of Federal Law [Doc. # 51, filed 2/9/2009] (the "Motion for Privilege Log"); and (2) Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery Regarding Qualified Immunity Defense [Doc. # 52, filed 2/9/2009] (the "Motion to Compel Discovery"). I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Privilege Log [Doc. # 51] is DENIED because the Defendants' Revised Privilege Log [Doc. # 57-2] fully meets the requirements of such a log. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Compel Discovery [Doc. # 52] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: GRANTED to require the defendants to respond fully and completely to Interrogatory No. 37. Defendants Robert Coney shall make a supplemental discovery response, in writing and under oath, on or before March 2, 2009; and DENIED in all other respects. Dated February 23, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?