General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona v. Century Surety Company

Filing 39

MINUTE ORDER denying 31 Defendant Century Surety Company's Motion to Strike Portion of Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to File Surreply, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/8/09.(ebs, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 08-cv-01528-PAB-MEH GENERAL SECURITY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ARIZONA f/k/a FULCRUM INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff, v. CENTURY SURETY COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ Order Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer This matter comes before the Court on defendant Century Surety Company's Motion to Strike Portion of Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to File Surreply [Docket No. 31]. The Court has reviewed the motion and is fully advised in the premises. The Court finds that plaintiff did not raise a new issue in its Reply in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, but rather responded to an argument raised by defendant. Further, the parties have had sufficient opportunity to brief the relevant issues. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion to Strike Portion of Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to File Surreply [Docket No. 31] is DENIED. Dated July 8, 2009.