Clyne v. Walters
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Marcia S. Krieger: Evidentiary Hearing held on 9/22/2009. 81 Joint Motion for Ruling Fed.R.Evid 702 is GRANTED. ORDER:For purposes of Rule 702 an adequate foundation has been established for admission of Ms. Lutzs ultimate opinion. (Court Reporter Paul Zuckerman) (mskcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO HONORABLE MARCIA S. KRIEGER Courtroom Deputy: Court Reporter: Patricia Glover Paul Zuckerman Date: September 22, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-cv-01646-MSK-CBS P a r t i e s: CAROL CLYNE, Plaintiff, v. RAY WALTERS, Defendant. COURTROOM MINUTES HEARING: Evidentiary - Rule 702 9:02 a. m. Court in session John D. Martin Counsel: Michael W. Baty
Plaintiff begins to state what it believes are the contested Opinions in Ms. Lutz' report. 9:08 a.m. 9:55 a.m. Court in recess Court in session
Statements from both counsel in response to the Court's questions. The parties concur that at issue for this hearing is whether the methodology used by Ms. Lutz is reliable or sufficiently reliable to allow her to express the ultimate opinion. Witness sworn for the plaintiff : Shari Lutz: 10:13 a.m. Direct Examination by Mr. Baty. Cross examination of witness by Mr. Martin. Re-direct examination of witness by Mr. Baty. The Court questions the witness. Further cross examination of witness by Mr. Martin.
Courtroom Minutes Judge Marcia S. Krieger Page 2 12:11 p.m. 1:34 p.m. Court in recess Court in session
Argument by counsel. ORDER: Joint Motion for Ruling Fed. R. Evid. 702 (Doc. #81) is GRANTED.
Oral findings are made of record and incorporated herein. ORDER: 2:10 p. m. For purposes of Rule 702 an adequate foundation has been established for admission of Ms. Lutz's ultimate opinion. Court in recess.
Total Time: 2 hours 58 minutes. Hearing concluded.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?