Estate of David Rance Rossiter et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, Colorado et al

Filing 86

ORDER. A Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice All Claims against Defendant Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, Colorado 84 was filed 10/07/2009. This matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all claims against Defendant Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, Colorado, each party to pay their own fees and costs. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/08/2009.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Case No. 08-cv-01661-LTB-KLM ESTATE OF DAVID RANCE ROSSITER, by Charles Rossiter and Erin Rossiter as Co-Personal Representatives, CHARLES ROSSITER, as Parent and Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of David Rance Rossiter, and ERIN ROSSITER, as Parent and Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of David Rance Rossiter, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO, SHERIFF GRAYSON ROBINSON, in his individual and official capacity, and OFFICER DANIEL JOSEPH MONTANA, JR., in his individual and official capacity, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER _______________________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice All Claims against Defendant Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, Colorado (Doc 84 - filed October 7, 2009), and the Court being fully advised in the premises, it is therefore ORDERED that this matter shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all claims against Defendant Board of County Commissioners of Arapahoe County, Colorado, each party to pay their own fees and costs. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: October 8, 2009 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?