Wood v. Salyards et al

Filing 17

Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Scheduling Conference held on 3/16/2009 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Amend and Add Parties Defendant, filed March 12, 2009 16 , is granted. Plaintiff has ten days to file a revised Amended Complaint. No scheduling order entered.Defendants will respond to the Amended Complaint pursuant to the rules.(Reporter FTR - K. Terasaki) (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: March 16, 2009 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki ____________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 08-cv-01692-RPM RANDY WOOD, Plaintiff, v. JAMES SALYARDS and TOWN OF SOUTH FORK, No appearance Michael C. Wathen Charles C. Powers Defendants ____________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ____________________________________________________________________________ Scheduling Conference 10:45 a.m. Court in session. Discussion regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Amend and Add Parties Defendant, filed March 12, 2009 [16]. Mr. Wathen states defendant Town of South Fork does not object to plaintiff's motion [16] and Mr. Powers represents that Sara Cook has informed him that defendant Salyards also does not object. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Amend and Add Parties Defendant, filed March 12, 2009 [16], is granted. Plaintiff has ten days to file a revised Amended Complaint. Counsel state they do not know who will represent the additional parties. Discussion regarding case facts, discovery and damages. ORDERED: No scheduling order entered. Defendants will respond to the Amended Complaint pursuant to the rules. Court in recess. 10:55 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time: 10 min.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?